|
Maybe I should perhaps give more clarity to my "Bush is worse for this world than Hitler" comment. I've spent the last six years of my education studying the Nazi party and Hitler so I feel confident in saying this. The main differences between the two rest upon the fact that Hitler and the Nazi Party was elected nice and legally with little dispute in 1933. Something that cannot be said of Bush in 2000.
Obviously the Nazi domestic policy towards certain groups was utterly hideous and disgusting, but the Bush Administration has a similar policy towards certain groups, condemning them not to death via concentration camps but to a slower social death due to the crushing poverty and lack of hope that causes crime.
Employment within Nazi Germany was incredibly high, along with the standard education and healthcare, this cannot be said of America at the moment.
I'm not trying to gloss over Nazi Germany, but I feel my comparison stands and for the world at the moment, Hitler would do less damage than Bush.
|