»

[dan da man]

if they are going to put the game online, they should make it like RE online, co-op but more stealth to kill the enemy.

[kupoartist]

Originally posted by mark0
Final Fantasy VII was on 3 cd's, the graphics were crap compared to FFX, but the game was huge. Now FFX, it's graphics just dwarve those of FFVII, yet it is only on one DVD!!

yes, but a CD has a maximum capicity of 700mb. 3x 700 is a lot less than the 4.28 gigs that my PC tells me is on that one FFX DVD. Plus, theres about 6.6gigs on the biggest DVD I have. Thats nearly 10 times the capacity of a CD. It would therefore take a massive game to fill an entire DVD and spill over into a second one. It'll be a while until we see one of those, unless MGS3 is going to be 90% movie and 10% game. No-one wants that.

[mark0™]

I'm just trying to emphasise the size of a DVD disk, even if it is 90% movie, it would still rule (the game is already mostly movies anyways)

[Gaseous_Baboon]

Heck, I'm just a-waitin for Substance to come out on PS2...

[ssjtrunks13]

You said that before, and I am just wiating for Substance too.

Also, I wouldn't mind if it was 90% FMV and 10% gameplay as long as it's comparitive to the amount of...never mind.

[dan da man]

i would'nt mind it to be 90% cut-scenes and 10% gameplay, but it would not happen, not even a game on the market is made like that.
kojima made mgs2 to be like a movie which is was. with all the cut-scenes which i hope he repeats it agian, i would like 60% gameplay and 40% cut-scenes or 50-50. actullay i dont even care alongs as it longer than mgs1 and mgs2 even though they were lond adventures.

[ssjtrunks13]

The second isn't as long as some other games I've played. I was thinking about 50/50 and that makes more sense.

[Gaseous_Baboon]

Me? I'm content to wait for Substance on PS2.

[MakgSnake]

I dont care how the game looks, what matters is how LONG is the game. To be honest I want MGS3 to be a very very long game, which I can play like I am watching a SOUP on TV.

Thats why I want it to be on atleast 2 DVD disk. That'll make it longer!!!

But for some reason I think if MGS3 comes on 2 DVD disk, it would be because of being VERY HIGH On graphics. LISTEN people, PS2 is capable of making the most amazing graphics too, its just that, TOO MUCH OF GRAPHICS takes alot of space on the DVD (which normally is 4 CDs).. So yeah!!

And like Kojima has said that he wants to take the same amount of LEAP for graphics he took for MGS1 to MGS2 on MGS3. So I think he'll take alot of space of the DVDs on Graphics. Cause thats the only way to make the graphics ultra amazing.

Oh well..... I dont mind that. Beautiful graphics never bugged me.

[dan da man]

Yea makg, a long MGS3 will be very, very good, onto the graphics, do you think we will have to buy the ps2 hardrive? to get the best out of the ps2 and mgs3?

[ssjtrunks13]

I sure hope not, not that it would be really bad. Yea, hbe should make it real long, I'm talking about longer than FF7. It took me about a month to do it, I would like a game that would take me maybe three months to do.

[kupoartist]

Originally posted by MakgSnake

And like Kojima has said that he wants to take the same amount of LEAP for graphics he took for MGS1 to MGS2 on MGS3.

then he'll need a PS3 to develop for. Surely he notices that theres an ever so slight difference in graphical ability between the PS1 and PS2? If MGS3 is on the PS2, the graphics seriously can't get that much better: the PS2 isn't fully stretched yet, but it is not far off. The only graphics that will fill an entire DVD disc are FMVs. Lots of them, rendered as best as the PS2 allows. No matter how many high resolution supper fabby textures a developer puts in a game, the PS2 won't be able to show them because It can't do it fast enough. Wonderful graphics = Slideshow. Besides, if the best PC games, with all the graphical splendry come on 2 cds, why is MGS3, a PS2 game, going to come on 2 DVDs, unless it has 24 extensive missions that keep you playing for 3 months +.

Does anyone else find it a little unrealistic for an action game to be that long? I mean, when do you want to actually play MGS3?

[dan da man]

Originally posted by ssjtrunks13

I sure hope not, not that it would be really bad. Yea, hbe should make it real long, I'm talking about longer than FF7. It took me about a month to do it, I would like a game that would take me maybe three months to do.

Now way I want it as long as FF7, it would just get repetetive. As for the graphics they are going to be alot better than mgs2, mgs2 graphics are a couple of years old now, surely they got to get better. But if they put mgs3 on xbox it would be better (graphics).

[ssjtrunks13]

I was saying as long as it doesn't get repetitive, I just wasn't sure if I should have put that in there when I wrote it.

[dan da man]

Originally posted by ssjtrunks13

I was saying as long as it doesn't get repetitive, I just wasn't sure if I should have put that in there when I wrote it.

Nah...it's you opinion, so you put it up on the board, but trunks I would rather have it the length of FF7 insted of completing it in like 2 days what I did with mgs2.

[ssjtrunks13]

What mode/s did you beat it on? As far as I'm concerned I still haven't completed the game.

[dan da man]

Originally posted by ssjtrunks13

What mode/s did you beat it on? As far as I'm concerned I still haven't completed the game.

Which game?

[ssjtrunks13]

MGS2, FFVII doesn't have difficulties to choose from.

[dan da man]

mgs2- normal first time.

I havent really played FF7 so I would'nt know, I just know a friend who's got it and watched him play it, it took him along time to do it.

[ssjtrunks13]

No wonder you got through the game in 2 days, you played it on a fairly easy difficuty. It would have took me two days if I hadn't went for the dog tags or had more time on my hands to play it.