PsFantasy.com Forums - View Single Post

Lone Wolf · Dec 3rd, 2002, 08:58 AM

I think MGS1 was vastly better than the sequel. The story was so much better in one. It went into fiction yes, but a secret project was a bit less of a reach than a group of 12 men secretly running things in the entire world. The bosses were much better in MGS. Look at Fox-Hound then look at Dead Cell. Fox-Hound had a kickass sniper, a telepath/kenetic/psycho, a face changing spy, a gun expert and huge shaman. Dead Cell is pitiful a lucky woman, a fat bastard, a "vamp" and Solidus Snake (the only decent guy). When you look at it, which was easier, as well? Dead Cell by far.

Graphics, clearly MGS2 has that since it's on a PS2. But if they were both on the PS2 which would you like better? Snake v.s. that rat bastard Raiden. Clearly, Snake would crush the little kid. Who even had better backup? You like Rose? If so, you're a rare person, indeed. Mei Ling wasn't annoying at all, neither were Master Miller or Nastasha Romanenko. As for general gameplay, again that ties into graphics somewhat. But which was tougher? Go back and play MGS1 then 2 and compare. I like harder games so that's up to your own preference of whether you just want to watch a movie or a play a game. MGS2 was more like a movie in my opinion.

X vBulletin 3.8.10 Debug Information
Page Generation 0.34387 seconds Memory Usage 1,875KB Queries Executed 8 (?)
More Information
Template Usage: (1)SHOWTHREAD_SHOWPOST (1)ad_footer_end (1)ad_footer_start (1)ad_header_end (1)ad_header_logo (1)ad_navbar_below (1)footer (1)gobutton (1)header (1)headinclude (1)option (1)postbit_legacy (1)postbit_onlinestatus (1)postbit_reputation (1)postbit_wrapper (1)spacer_close (1)spacer_open Phrase Groups Available: global postbit reputationlevel showthread	Included Files: ./showpost.php ./global.php ./includes/init.php ./includes/class_core.php ./includes/config.php ./includes/functions.php ./includes/class_datastore.php ./includes/datastore/datastore_cache.php ./includes/class_hook.php ./includes/functions_cat_cfgeoblock.php ./includes/functions_cat_edittime.php ./includes/adminfunctions.php ./includes/functions_bigthree.php ./includes/class_postbit.php ./includes/class_bbcode.php ./includes/functions_reputation.php Hooks Called: init_startup cache_permissions fetch_postinfo_query fetch_postinfo fetch_threadinfo_query fetch_threadinfo fetch_foruminfo style_fetch cache_templates global_start parse_templates global_setup_complete showpost_start bbcode_fetch_tags bbcode_create postbit_factory showpost_post postbit_display_start fetch_musername reputation_image postbit_imicons bbcode_parse_start bbcode_parse_complete_precache bbcode_parse_complete postbit_display_complete showpost_complete
Messages:

Dec 3rd, 2002, 08:58 AM	#8
Lone Wolf Keyblade Master Joined: May 2002 Posts: 37	I think MGS1 was vastly better than the sequel. The story was so much better in one. It went into fiction yes, but a secret project was a bit less of a reach than a group of 12 men secretly running things in the entire world. The bosses were much better in MGS. Look at Fox-Hound then look at Dead Cell. Fox-Hound had a kickass sniper, a telepath/kenetic/psycho, a face changing spy, a gun expert and huge shaman. Dead Cell is pitiful a lucky woman, a fat bastard, a "vamp" and Solidus Snake (the only decent guy). When you look at it, which was easier, as well? Dead Cell by far. Graphics, clearly MGS2 has that since it's on a PS2. But if they were both on the PS2 which would you like better? Snake v.s. that rat bastard Raiden. Clearly, Snake would crush the little kid. Who even had better backup? You like Rose? If so, you're a rare person, indeed. Mei Ling wasn't annoying at all, neither were Master Miller or Nastasha Romanenko. As for general gameplay, again that ties into graphics somewhat. But which was tougher? Go back and play MGS1 then 2 and compare. I like harder games so that's up to your own preference of whether you just want to watch a movie or a play a game. MGS2 was more like a movie in my opinion.