Filesharing! (Woe & Various random recollections)
 

Okay, this isn't your normal topic about how music piracy is killing music (it isn't, money is) but rather I'm forced to complain about how people are sharing glitched files. Look kids, I want to listen to Heavenly VS Satan in a decent bitrate without it glitching. Is that too much? Apparently so.

So, in order to celebrate the six years and three months since filesharing hit notorious highs with the Napster VS Metallica playground scuffle, lets have some exciting stories of how you thought you were downloading the latest [insert band here] only to find out that it was Cliff Richard. Or merely someone making a cup of tea. Or other exciting stories!

Incidently, to fuel some sort of debate, I really am split as to whether obtaining music through filesharing is morally correct. I'm less concerned about the legal ramifications of such when compared to that of ripping off the small artist. As such I'll try to only target music that is on a major label where the artist would probably see a very slight percentage of my record purchase. Anything on an independant I'll look to buy, unless it's really hard to find or has been deleted (Heavenly vs Satan for instance, or anything on Sarah Records).

Does Filesharing have a legitimate future though? I've been estimating that it has only had a year left since 2004. Do you feel it is right to obtain music using such methods? Do you refuse to obtain music in such a way? Do tell!


P.S: I in no way whatsoever condone piracy of any kind, except that involving Johnny Depp and ghostly monkeys. Yes. YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A [insert object here] ETC.

It's a difficult one, have thought about this lots of time. Music industry is f%^@# up, I mean cd's are sold here for 22€, the artist may only get as little as 1,50 € for it in the end. So when downloading who are you ripping off? They say you're ripping the artists, cause people might feel compassion for them but instead you're ripping off the industry that's why they make such a big deal out of it. Artists make money through shows/airplay royalties/appearances etc. As long as those big-ass stars can buy airplanes, multiple "cribs", 30 rolls royces etc. I couldn't care less about downloading, as long as the hardworking, creative, smaller artists can make a decent buck and enjoy the fruits of their labour. Artists that make great music and deserve my hard earned cash, will get it in the end cause I will buy their cd's and I think a lot of other people will too(maybe even after downloading it).

They assume YOU (aka a generic way to address to anybody) wouldn't do that, but as a matter of fact the actions involved in the process of stealing an object and downloading are different, this means also the mechanism in a person's perception is a bit different. And thinking about it, it's not that stealing a car and downloading stuff are exactly the same thing. There are so many ways of "stealing", and the question changes if you consider the term according to its literal or non-literal meaning. The slogan - YOU WOULDNT STEAL X - can be effective for people who don't download or who have never downloaded anything in their lives, but its impact is none on everybody else, also because it is so very simplistic and, as a result, ludicrous.

PS: not that piracy without grog is a good thing, anyway...

Wise words, very nicely said indeed.

I remember reading a thread by meryl (haven't replied to it, I only read thread and article and I felt very angered at the time) regarding a writer whose work has been exploited by big names in media without being paid. That is also piracy. I don't think filesharing is the worst example of piracy and copyright infringement.

Who said I wouldn't steal a car?! :peoples: