mgs3 prediction
 

when do u think metal gear solid 3 game will be released?

my prediction is 2005 now, it took 3 years to do sons of liberty, so mgs3 might take around the same time and it was announced in 2002 mgs3 was in the works, but this time i dont think they will rush mgs3 they dont want another mgs2 where they didnt do the complete version so they had to do substance aswell.
if it released in 2005 i think it might aswell be released on the playstation 3 so the graphics are the best of the best, because if it was released in 2004 on the ps2 ppl could look back when they got the ps3 and say wasnt mgs3 graphics lame, now because playstation 3 graphics obviuosly are going to be state of the art and kill ps2!
if the game is going to be released in 2005 (my prediction) it will have some tough competition to make 2005 game of the year because in that year grand theft auto 6 will be out i know this because rockstars say grand theft auto is going upto gta7 (wow!)
wait! but if mgs3 is going to be shown at the E3 it they might release it in 2004! the year i want it to be released in. but if the mgs3 is released in 2004 hideo kojima and his team would of only spent 2 years creating the game, not enuf IMO.

As for mgs online wich is now coming out for sure when do u think that will be released, mgs3 just might have the online capabilities so it would be the same date,

so what do u think the date for mgs3 will be just your prediction up! mine is 2005 on the ps3 , 2004 would be nice indeed.
but if kojima is showing mgs3 at E3 wont it be ps2 not ps3 because that wont be made yet and it wont be the same graphics, im am confused.

my insane guess for mgs3 is 14/3/05 or 3/14/05<U.S. date.

Re: mgs3 prediction
 

I would write a whole lot, but I have work right now. So I'll come back and write in detail, but just letting you know. Just because Kojima and his team said that they started working on MGS3 in 2002, doesn't mean they are telling the truth.

Kojima and his team started making MGS2 in OCT 1998. As soon as they released MGS1. So I am assuming, they started working on MGS3 on SEPT 2001 (That was the time the MGS2 game was suppose to be released, but because of Sept 11, was delayed to November).

So Sept 2001 to Sept 2002 to Sept 2003 to Sept 2004 Means..... Three Years in the Making, Which makes perfect sense. I really wouldn't mind MGS3 coming out on PS2 in 2004. I would LOVE THAT. But not In 2003 XMAS, now that will be rushing it! :)

hmmm i think you could be right that they might be not saying the truth and it would make alot of sense.
if what u are say makg is right, it could make me alot happier about mgs3 not being rushed.
for sure i dont want it for christmas 2003 it would be being rushed, 2004 on the ps2 is the right date for me, but im think 2005 is going to be the date.

Hopefully Kojima already has his own visions for the Story and that he knows exactly by now what he wants as an overall feel for the Story and Gameplay of the game. And then they should take theyre time to develop the game at a steady speed and make sure they dont miss out things like the whole Substance/Sons of Liberty crap, but thats if Konami is willing to fund the development over a period of 3, 4 or maybe 5 years. I'd seriously wouldn't mind waiting long periods like 5 years for a game which is already so anticipated, It would not only give us all a big sensation to await the game (If it lasts too long we may just forget about it) but If the game takes longer then supposedly It would be better.

But I say just chill out, when the game comes out, enjoy it. There will be plenty of games to occupy us until it comes out, we may see games which are better than it. But then again, MGS3 may turn out to be a big dissapointment :( Nah, no way could that happen :)

I think that wheneva MGS3 comes out it will be a truly spectacular game. Why? you ask. well lets think about this for a min,at the very worst this is what we will get:-

GAMEPLAY:-
if they rush it, it wud be similar to Sons of liberty in terms of gameplay(which isnt exactly a bad thing is it) they wud proberly make the gameplay a least a litle bit better.

STORYLINE:-
The storyline will be good and they wud learn from the mistake of makin it complicated (i loved the story from SOL but alot of other ppl critise it for bein to complex) but that the story wud be superb for sure.

GRAPHICS:-
The graphics will be amazing weather its on PS2 or PS3. If its on PS2 then at minimum they will be marginally better than SOL.

ENVIROMENT:-
They will have to take the time to create a new and exciting settin for MGS3. We know the settin will be fantastic.

I cud go on but i dont have the time right now. All of the above is what i would expect if they were to rush the game IMO.
As for the release date, i wud say mid to late 2004.

this time i dont think kojima wont rush it, he is going to make a bigger, better, mgs than ever before, trust me kojima is GOD he wont let us down for sure.:)

I'm sure it can only get better.

i dont think he wil rush it either. I cant wait for it now.;) i think its safe to assume it will be the best MGS game when it finally does come out.
:laugh:

ME TOO!!

but if mgs3 is anything like splinter cell i will kill my self.

It may but you'll be back to the way you were afterwards, right?:laugh:

I think a new gear suit for every mission would be awesome!

2 Disks would be a lot, right? That would be great.

2 disc is would be perfect like metal gear solid.

i cant wait for mgs3 i think about it all the time, i just cant wait for kojima to reveal it at the E3!!!!!

After reading the MGS1 & 2 parody thread, I realised that the story and characters on Metal Gear Solid were really crap! But I don't really care as the Tactical Espionage Action was really were it was at, and the story was entertaining. I hope the game is a little more expansive, allowing multiply choices with various outcomes, including failure of missions and special bonuses. More levels as you said Makg would really be good, I'd like to see Snake/Raiden doing a little globetroting, hopefully with vast levels in Asia, Middle East, Manhatten (duh) and possibly Europe.

A little more freedom of choice would go appreciated, such as various plans and routes. Being able to control a small group of maybe 2 or 3 guys assisting you in the mission would be sweet too, even tough the game focuse on solo missions, they should make the game a little more realistic and please god, dont let Kojima remake Metal Gear Solid again!! I want a new story line, Not another Shadow Moses Simulation. Plus the game needs a lot more bosses than what MGS2 had :disturb:

But I hope they put countless hours of effort into this game and really acheive Konami Japans Potential, I hope to god that they dont slack off, because I felt MGS2 was way too repetitive :(

i would luv mgs3 to have about 10 diffrent endings so the replay value would keep us playing till we got all 10.
different locations, somehow i dont think that will happen guys, but u never know.

*points socom at kojima threating him i dont want mgs3 to be like splinter cell AT ALL!!!*

seriously guys if mgs3 is like splinter cell im going to go insane!!!!!!

but no way would kojima do anything like that, its going to be a new metal gear experince!!!!!

You guys sure have a lot of predictions. I can't come up with any. I was never really good at this stuff like poetry and songs/rhymes.

I'm just waiting for Substance on Ps2 myself....

But 2, maybe 3 DVD disks would surely be magnificent.

Final Fantasy VII was on 3 cd's, the graphics were crap compared to FFX, but the game was huge. Now FFX, it's graphics just dwarve those of FFVII, yet it is only on one DVD!!

If Konami make the game so big that it would have to span over at least 2 DVD's, you just know it's gonna be huge.

And I wouldn't say an action game wouldnt need a second disk, Konami may put even more FMV in this game too, maybe an extra level or two (that I would really like to see) and maybe they'll try to increase the replay factor with a few extra features, I was thinking that multiplayer would be good, but if it was deathmatch, it wouldn't work so good, because how can you sneak on someone who can watch your screen, but deathmatch would be much more suited to MG Online. But a Multiplayer Co-Op!!! Doesn't that sound great!!! Imagine player 1 controlling Snake and Player 2 controlling Raiden!! At the same time!

hehe I've got myself excited